https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333541 The court upheld the order demanding part payment for the grant of stay in appeal, as the petitioner's claim for exemption on pan masala containing tobacco was not valid under the amended provisions of the MVAT Act. The court also validated Clause (10) of the Notification dated 21.1.2006, which excluded pan masala containing tobacco from the definition of 'tobacco', stating that the State had the authority to levy VAT on such products. The court dismissed the writ petitions and granted the petitioners six weeks to make the part payment. en-us Tue, 04 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333541 The court upheld the order demanding part payment for the grant of stay in appeal, as the petitioner's claim for exemption on pan masala containing tobacco was not valid under the amended provisions of the MVAT Act. The court also validated Clause (10) of the Notification dated 21.1.2006, which excluded pan masala containing tobacco from the definition of 'tobacco', stating that the State had the authority to levy VAT on such products. The court dismissed the writ petitions and granted the petitioners six weeks to make the part payment. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 04 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333541