<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 559 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333539</link>
    <description>The High Court criticized the Assessing Officer for not independently considering the petitioner&#039;s objections and lacking reasons for decision. The Court set aside the assessment orders, remitting the matters for fresh consideration by the respondent. The Court directed the respondent to review objections, verify records independently, and grant a personal hearing to the petitioner for submission of supporting records, aiming for a fair assessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:31:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 559 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333539</link>
      <description>The High Court criticized the Assessing Officer for not independently considering the petitioner&#039;s objections and lacking reasons for decision. The Court set aside the assessment orders, remitting the matters for fresh consideration by the respondent. The Court directed the respondent to review objections, verify records independently, and grant a personal hearing to the petitioner for submission of supporting records, aiming for a fair assessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>