<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 559 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333539</link>
    <description>Assessment orders were unsustainable where the Assessing Officer failed to independently consider the dealer&#039;s detailed objections and instead mechanically adopted the Enforcement Wing report. The authority was required to examine the objections on their merits, verify the records produced, and give reasons for accepting or rejecting the explanation of clerical error and the claim of exemption. Because the orders showed no real application of mind, they were set aside and remitted for fresh consideration after independent scrutiny of the objections and records and after affording personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:31:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=445041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 559 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333539</link>
      <description>Assessment orders were unsustainable where the Assessing Officer failed to independently consider the dealer&#039;s detailed objections and instead mechanically adopted the Enforcement Wing report. The authority was required to examine the objections on their merits, verify the records produced, and give reasons for accepting or rejecting the explanation of clerical error and the claim of exemption. Because the orders showed no real application of mind, they were set aside and remitted for fresh consideration after independent scrutiny of the objections and records and after affording personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>