https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187292 The Tribunal condoned the delay of 105 days in filing the appeal, noting the appellant's explanation of an employee misplacing the impugned order without informing management out of fear. Emphasizing the absence of malafide intent or deliberate breach of law, the Tribunal admitted the appeal, recognizing the appellant's potential harm without condonation. Additionally, in the stay application, the Tribunal waived pre-deposit of the balance tax demand of &8377; 56,514/- until the appeal's disposal, allowing both the Miscellaneous Application (COD) and the stay application in the specified terms. en-us Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:06:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187292 The Tribunal condoned the delay of 105 days in filing the appeal, noting the appellant's explanation of an employee misplacing the impugned order without informing management out of fear. Emphasizing the absence of malafide intent or deliberate breach of law, the Tribunal admitted the appeal, recognizing the appellant's potential harm without condonation. Additionally, in the stay application, the Tribunal waived pre-deposit of the balance tax demand of &8377; 56,514/- until the appeal's disposal, allowing both the Miscellaneous Application (COD) and the stay application in the specified terms. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187292