<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (4) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5411</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision that the excess amount charged by Agro Corporation in the sale of tractors was part of the sale price and not a refundable amount. The court concluded that there was no statutory or contractual obligation for Agro Corporation to refund the excess amount to purchasers. Therefore, the excess amount was deemed as part of the sale price and not included in the assessee&#039;s total income for taxation purposes. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court&#039;s ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (4) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5411</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision that the excess amount charged by Agro Corporation in the sale of tractors was part of the sale price and not a refundable amount. The court concluded that there was no statutory or contractual obligation for Agro Corporation to refund the excess amount to purchasers. Therefore, the excess amount was deemed as part of the sale price and not included in the assessee&#039;s total income for taxation purposes. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court&#039;s ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>