<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Registration</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=111031</link>
    <description>Where multiple units in a State share a single PAN and constitute the same taxable person, the draft GST law envisages that single registration will generally suffice; separate registrations are proposed for distinct business activities. The draft leaves unresolved whether inter-unit job-work transfers attract tax, how input tax credit will be allocated, and whether returns and payment obligations will be consolidated or maintained unit-wise, with final treatment dependent on the enacted statute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:42:47 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:56:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Registration</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=111031</link>
      <description>Where multiple units in a State share a single PAN and constitute the same taxable person, the draft GST law envisages that single registration will generally suffice; separate registrations are proposed for distinct business activities. The draft leaves unresolved whether inter-unit job-work transfers attract tax, how input tax credit will be allocated, and whether returns and payment obligations will be consolidated or maintained unit-wise, with final treatment dependent on the enacted statute.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:42:47 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=111031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>