<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Dispute Between AO and CIT(A) Over Penalty Imposition u/s 271(1)(c); Disallowance Doesn&#039;t Mean Automatic Penalty.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=31710</link>
    <description>AO and the CIT (A) are not on the same page for levy of penalty u/s 271 (1)(c) of the Act. Further, mere disallowance of a claim will not automatically attract the levy of penalty - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:37:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:37:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Dispute Between AO and CIT(A) Over Penalty Imposition u/s 271(1)(c); Disallowance Doesn&#039;t Mean Automatic Penalty.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=31710</link>
      <description>AO and the CIT (A) are not on the same page for levy of penalty u/s 271 (1)(c) of the Act. Further, mere disallowance of a claim will not automatically attract the levy of penalty - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:37:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=31710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>