<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 549 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333529</link>
    <description>The court dismissed all petitions, affirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, validating the recorded satisfaction note, and finding prima facie evidence linking incriminating documents to the petitioner. Additionally, the court ruled that the petitioner prematurely filed the writ petition without exhausting alternative remedies as required by law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:37:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 549 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333529</link>
      <description>The court dismissed all petitions, affirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, validating the recorded satisfaction note, and finding prima facie evidence linking incriminating documents to the petitioner. Additionally, the court ruled that the petitioner prematurely filed the writ petition without exhausting alternative remedies as required by law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>