<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1148 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187269</link>
    <description>Deferred availment of the balance 50% Cenvat credit on capital goods is permitted only where the goods remain in the manufacturer&#039;s possession and use in the subsequent financial year. On the stated facts, the moulds and dies had been destroyed during manufacture and were no longer available in that year, so the statutory condition under Rule 57AC(2)(b) was not met. The denial of the balance credit was therefore justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:15:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1148 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187269</link>
      <description>Deferred availment of the balance 50% Cenvat credit on capital goods is permitted only where the goods remain in the manufacturer&#039;s possession and use in the subsequent financial year. On the stated facts, the moulds and dies had been destroyed during manufacture and were no longer available in that year, so the statutory condition under Rule 57AC(2)(b) was not met. The denial of the balance credit was therefore justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>