<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 1002 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187258</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 2,70,000 and the disallowance of interest on unexplained cash credits. It held that the assessee had proven the source of the loans from minors unrelated to the firm, accepted under the Amnesty Scheme. The Tribunal found no basis to treat the amount as undisclosed income, emphasizing the revenue&#039;s failure to establish a connection between the declared income and the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2016 18:21:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 1002 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187258</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 2,70,000 and the disallowance of interest on unexplained cash credits. It held that the assessee had proven the source of the loans from minors unrelated to the firm, accepted under the Amnesty Scheme. The Tribunal found no basis to treat the amount as undisclosed income, emphasizing the revenue&#039;s failure to establish a connection between the declared income and the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>