<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 903 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187256</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the claimed expenses on foreign exchange fluctuation and deletion of addition for unsecured loans under section 68. However, the Tribunal remitted the issue of interest expenses back to the CIT(A) for further examination. The Department&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, with the matter of interest paid requiring fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2016 16:41:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 903 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187256</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the claimed expenses on foreign exchange fluctuation and deletion of addition for unsecured loans under section 68. However, the Tribunal remitted the issue of interest expenses back to the CIT(A) for further examination. The Department&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, with the matter of interest paid requiring fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>