<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (2) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5396</link>
    <description>A provision for bonus set aside after the accounting year could not be deducted because the liability had not accrued during that year. The bonus obligation arose only after the year-end, following a subsequent government notification, so no existing liability had fastened on the assessee when the accounts closed. The amount was therefore only a contingent provision, not an allowable deduction under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The Court affirmed that a mere provision for a later-accruing liability is not deductible on identical facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (2) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5396</link>
      <description>A provision for bonus set aside after the accounting year could not be deducted because the liability had not accrued during that year. The bonus obligation arose only after the year-end, following a subsequent government notification, so no existing liability had fastened on the assessee when the accounts closed. The amount was therefore only a contingent provision, not an allowable deduction under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The Court affirmed that a mere provision for a later-accruing liability is not deductible on identical facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>