<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 540 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333520</link>
    <description>The High Court remanded the case for re-examination on the calculation method under Section 115JB(2) of the Income Tax Act. The appellant&#039;s challenge regarding the disallowance of brought forward losses for MAT purposes was upheld, with the Commissioner supporting the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision. The reopening of assessment under section 147 was deemed procedurally correct, and the interpretation of provisions under section 115JB, Explanation 1, clause (iii) was affirmed. Ultimately, the Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; orders, dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal and confirming the tax liability computation and treatment of losses for MAT purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2016 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 540 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333520</link>
      <description>The High Court remanded the case for re-examination on the calculation method under Section 115JB(2) of the Income Tax Act. The appellant&#039;s challenge regarding the disallowance of brought forward losses for MAT purposes was upheld, with the Commissioner supporting the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision. The reopening of assessment under section 147 was deemed procedurally correct, and the interpretation of provisions under section 115JB, Explanation 1, clause (iii) was affirmed. Ultimately, the Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; orders, dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal and confirming the tax liability computation and treatment of losses for MAT purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>