<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 539 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333519</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the disputed issues back to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for detailed adjudication, emphasizing the importance of speaking orders consistent with Transfer Pricing Provisions. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, stressing the need for proper adjudication and consideration of all points of dispute, ensuring a fair hearing for the assessee before a decision is made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2016 11:33:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 539 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333519</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the disputed issues back to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for detailed adjudication, emphasizing the importance of speaking orders consistent with Transfer Pricing Provisions. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, stressing the need for proper adjudication and consideration of all points of dispute, ensuring a fair hearing for the assessee before a decision is made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>