<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 521 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333501</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty of Rs. 4,99,520 imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s claim was made in good faith and supported by an auditor&#039;s certificate, thus not warranting the penalty. Consequently, the penalty was deleted, and the decision was pronounced on 16th August 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2016 17:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 521 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333501</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty of Rs. 4,99,520 imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s claim was made in good faith and supported by an auditor&#039;s certificate, thus not warranting the penalty. Consequently, the penalty was deleted, and the decision was pronounced on 16th August 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>