https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187238 The Tribunal rejected the appeal for condonation of delay of 10 months and 15 days in filing an appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. 89 & 90/2011 under Section 35B(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant's argument of being unaware of the order due to the departure of the employee who received it was not accepted, as the authorized signatory failed to manage the relevant central excise files and papers despite being with the company for over three months after resigning. The Tribunal deemed the delay unjustifiable and time-barred, leading to the rejection of the appeal. en-us Tue, 21 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Oct 2016 10:58:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187238 The Tribunal rejected the appeal for condonation of delay of 10 months and 15 days in filing an appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. 89 & 90/2011 under Section 35B(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant's argument of being unaware of the order due to the departure of the employee who received it was not accepted, as the authorized signatory failed to manage the relevant central excise files and papers despite being with the company for over three months after resigning. The Tribunal deemed the delay unjustifiable and time-barred, leading to the rejection of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 21 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187238