<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1145 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187239</link>
    <description>The judgment allows the appeal, setting aside the disallowance of cenvat credit by the Commissioner (Appeals). It emphasizes that if central excise authorities at the supplier&#039;s end accepted duty payment on the finished product, the appellant&#039;s authorities cannot deny cenvat credit. The decision highlights the significance of meeting conditions for claiming cenvat credit and restricts the role of jurisdictional authorities in disputing goods classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2016 10:58:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1145 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187239</link>
      <description>The judgment allows the appeal, setting aside the disallowance of cenvat credit by the Commissioner (Appeals). It emphasizes that if central excise authorities at the supplier&#039;s end accepted duty payment on the finished product, the appellant&#039;s authorities cannot deny cenvat credit. The decision highlights the significance of meeting conditions for claiming cenvat credit and restricts the role of jurisdictional authorities in disputing goods classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>