<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 1081 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187241</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) on the assessee for alleged concealment and furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income related to on-money receipts declared post a search. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, noting that the on-money receipts were disclosed in the return filed after the search and accepted during assessment, thus not warranting a penalty. The decision was based on the High Court&#039;s interpretation that no penalty is leviable if no addition is made post a search in the return. The penalty was ultimately deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2016 10:58:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 1081 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187241</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) on the assessee for alleged concealment and furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income related to on-money receipts declared post a search. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, noting that the on-money receipts were disclosed in the return filed after the search and accepted during assessment, thus not warranting a penalty. The decision was based on the High Court&#039;s interpretation that no penalty is leviable if no addition is made post a search in the return. The penalty was ultimately deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>