<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 507 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333487</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad, in a case concerning denial of credit on ethanol procurement due to the supplier not being required to pay duty, ruled in favor of the appellant. The Tribunal held that credit cannot be denied to the receiver when the supplier has paid duty and issued valid invoices, even if the product is not classified as excisable goods. The impugned order demanding recovery of credit with interest and imposing a penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, granting consequential reliefs if any.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 507 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333487</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad, in a case concerning denial of credit on ethanol procurement due to the supplier not being required to pay duty, ruled in favor of the appellant. The Tribunal held that credit cannot be denied to the receiver when the supplier has paid duty and issued valid invoices, even if the product is not classified as excisable goods. The impugned order demanding recovery of credit with interest and imposing a penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, granting consequential reliefs if any.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>