<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 500 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333480</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that jobbing transactions aimed at preventing business loss are not speculative under Section 43(5)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found no substantial question of law and dismissed the appeal in favor of the Respondent Assessee, clarifying the distinction between speculative and non-speculative transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:47:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 500 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333480</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that jobbing transactions aimed at preventing business loss are not speculative under Section 43(5)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found no substantial question of law and dismissed the appeal in favor of the Respondent Assessee, clarifying the distinction between speculative and non-speculative transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>