<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 498 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333478</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that additions of Rs. 20,00,000/- and Rs. 72,00,000/- for the assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10 were not justified without incriminating material found during the search. The AO should have relied on previous assessments under Section 143(3) or 143(1). Consequently, the appeals of the assessee were allowed, and the additions were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 498 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333478</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that additions of Rs. 20,00,000/- and Rs. 72,00,000/- for the assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10 were not justified without incriminating material found during the search. The AO should have relied on previous assessments under Section 143(3) or 143(1). Consequently, the appeals of the assessee were allowed, and the additions were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>