<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 495 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333475</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and upheld the deletions made by the CIT(A) in all instances. The Tribunal relied on legal precedents and factual considerations to support the decisions. The deletions included unexplained purchases, outstanding liabilities, non-deduction of TDS, bogus purchases, excess liabilities, and short deductions of TDS, with the Tribunal affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on each issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 495 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333475</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and upheld the deletions made by the CIT(A) in all instances. The Tribunal relied on legal precedents and factual considerations to support the decisions. The deletions included unexplained purchases, outstanding liabilities, non-deduction of TDS, bogus purchases, excess liabilities, and short deductions of TDS, with the Tribunal affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on each issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>