<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 492 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333472</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) to be invalid due to a defective notice under Section 274, lack of specific incriminating material linking the surrendered income, and the voluntary nature of the surrender. Consequently, the penalty was deleted for all the assessment years in question, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:46:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 492 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333472</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) to be invalid due to a defective notice under Section 274, lack of specific incriminating material linking the surrendered income, and the voluntary nature of the surrender. Consequently, the penalty was deleted for all the assessment years in question, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>