<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 488 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333468</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions made by the AO under various heads, including Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, undisclosed investment, undisclosed income, and undisclosed income from the sale of shares. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed on all grounds, with the delay in filing the appeal being condoned. The order was pronounced on 24/08/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:46:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 488 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333468</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions made by the AO under various heads, including Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, undisclosed investment, undisclosed income, and undisclosed income from the sale of shares. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed on all grounds, with the delay in filing the appeal being condoned. The order was pronounced on 24/08/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>