<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 484 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333464</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the disallowance of Cenvat credit and the confirmation of Service Tax demand. It found violations of natural justice in the disallowance of credit and deemed the Service Tax demand unsustainable due to potential double taxation. The appellant was directed to make a pre-deposit towards the Cenvat demand, with the balance amount waived upon compliance. Compliance with the pre-deposit was mandated by a specified date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:41:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 484 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333464</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the disallowance of Cenvat credit and the confirmation of Service Tax demand. It found violations of natural justice in the disallowance of credit and deemed the Service Tax demand unsustainable due to potential double taxation. The appellant was directed to make a pre-deposit towards the Cenvat demand, with the balance amount waived upon compliance. Compliance with the pre-deposit was mandated by a specified date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>