<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 483 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333463</link>
    <description>The tribunal remanded the case to the original authority for a fresh examination to determine any suppression of facts or misdeclaration by the appellant, reevaluate the cum-duty price, and re-quantify the demand and penalty accordingly. The appeal was disposed of by remand due to issues concerning limitation and cum-duty price not being raised before the lower authorities, requiring further assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:41:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 483 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333463</link>
      <description>The tribunal remanded the case to the original authority for a fresh examination to determine any suppression of facts or misdeclaration by the appellant, reevaluate the cum-duty price, and re-quantify the demand and penalty accordingly. The appeal was disposed of by remand due to issues concerning limitation and cum-duty price not being raised before the lower authorities, requiring further assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>