<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 479 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333459</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partially, upholding the admissibility of Cenvat credit on structural steel items used for supporting capital goods. However, the issue of duty demand and denial of benefit under Notification No. 67/95-CE was remanded for fresh adjudication, directing the authority to re-examine all records and evidence within a specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 14:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 479 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333459</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partially, upholding the admissibility of Cenvat credit on structural steel items used for supporting capital goods. However, the issue of duty demand and denial of benefit under Notification No. 67/95-CE was remanded for fresh adjudication, directing the authority to re-examine all records and evidence within a specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>