<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 472 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333452</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 108/95-CE applies to goods supplied for Government-approved projects financed by listed organisations where the organisation certifies intended use. The record, including purchase orders, delivery instructions and UNICEF procurement certificates, showed that the goods were ordered by UNICEF for use in UNICEF-assisted projects, satisfying the factual foundation for the exemption. The view that eligibility depended only on a certificate from an officer not below Deputy Secretary level was treated as a reading of the notification. The appellant was held entitled to the exemption for the clearances covered by the three show cause notices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 16:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 472 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333452</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 108/95-CE applies to goods supplied for Government-approved projects financed by listed organisations where the organisation certifies intended use. The record, including purchase orders, delivery instructions and UNICEF procurement certificates, showed that the goods were ordered by UNICEF for use in UNICEF-assisted projects, satisfying the factual foundation for the exemption. The view that eligibility depended only on a certificate from an officer not below Deputy Secretary level was treated as a reading of the notification. The appellant was held entitled to the exemption for the clearances covered by the three show cause notices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>