https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333443 Conviction under the NDPS Act was affirmed because the appellant did not challenge the trial court's findings and the record was sufficient to sustain guilt. The substantive sentence was left untouched because it was the statutory minimum, but the default sentence for non-payment of fine was reduced after considering the appellant's limited criminal history, satisfactory jail conduct, and the sentencing principle applied in a comparable narcotics matter. The appeal thus succeeded only to the limited extent of modification of the default sentence. en-us Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:34:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333443 Conviction under the NDPS Act was affirmed because the appellant did not challenge the trial court's findings and the record was sufficient to sustain guilt. The substantive sentence was left untouched because it was the statutory minimum, but the default sentence for non-payment of fine was reduced after considering the appellant's limited criminal history, satisfactory jail conduct, and the sentencing principle applied in a comparable narcotics matter. The appeal thus succeeded only to the limited extent of modification of the default sentence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333443