https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187228 The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the High Court and the Central Administrative Tribunal, affirming the repatriation of the appellant to the parent department. The appellant's challenge to the repatriation order was rejected due to discrepancies in educational qualifications and lack of indispensability in the CBI. The Court emphasized that deputationists do not have a vested right for permanent absorption without statutory rules and dismissed the appellant's claim for exemption from educational qualification requirements. The appeal was ultimately dismissed without costs, highlighting the appellant's unreliable conduct as a key factor in the decision. en-us Mon, 24 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:08:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187228 The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the High Court and the Central Administrative Tribunal, affirming the repatriation of the appellant to the parent department. The appellant's challenge to the repatriation order was rejected due to discrepancies in educational qualifications and lack of indispensability in the CBI. The Court emphasized that deputationists do not have a vested right for permanent absorption without statutory rules and dismissed the appellant's claim for exemption from educational qualification requirements. The appeal was ultimately dismissed without costs, highlighting the appellant's unreliable conduct as a key factor in the decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 24 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187228