<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 1336 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187227</link>
    <description>Employees sent on deputation to a newly created bureau did not acquire an enforceable right to permanent absorption merely because they continued in service after the recruitment rules came into force and rendered long service. The governing scheme contemplated filling posts by direct selection or transfer, and no express rule created a legal entitlement to absorption or justified a writ of mandamus. The administration could still consider the employees for absorption if they were otherwise suitable, but that was a matter of discretion, not enforceable right.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:04:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 1336 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187227</link>
      <description>Employees sent on deputation to a newly created bureau did not acquire an enforceable right to permanent absorption merely because they continued in service after the recruitment rules came into force and rendered long service. The governing scheme contemplated filling posts by direct selection or transfer, and no express rule created a legal entitlement to absorption or justified a writ of mandamus. The administration could still consider the employees for absorption if they were otherwise suitable, but that was a matter of discretion, not enforceable right.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>