<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 696 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187219</link>
    <description>Review jurisdiction is confined to correcting a substantial error or other ground warranting reconsideration on the material before the Court. On examination of the review petitions and connected papers, the SC found no merit, no substantial question, and no error justifying interference. The petitions were therefore not entertained and were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:37:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 696 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187219</link>
      <description>Review jurisdiction is confined to correcting a substantial error or other ground warranting reconsideration on the material before the Court. On examination of the review petitions and connected papers, the SC found no merit, no substantial question, and no error justifying interference. The petitions were therefore not entertained and were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>