<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 1162 - itat Gauhati</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187215</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of income under section 68, citing the adequacy of confirmatory letters and the proper admission of additional evidence. The tribunal emphasized the necessity of verifying loan transactions and assessing loan creditors&#039; capacity, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:10:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 1162 - itat Gauhati</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187215</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of income under section 68, citing the adequacy of confirmatory letters and the proper admission of additional evidence. The tribunal emphasized the necessity of verifying loan transactions and assessing loan creditors&#039; capacity, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>