<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 458 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333438</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, in a case involving default in duty payment for different periods. While upholding the penalty under Section 77, the Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s voluntary duty payment before the show-cause notice did not warrant penalty imposition under Section 78. Drawing a distinction from a High Court decision, the Tribunal concluded that the circumstances in the present case did not demonstrate intentional non-payment or evasion of duty, leading to the partial allowance of the appeals regarding penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 458 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333438</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, in a case involving default in duty payment for different periods. While upholding the penalty under Section 77, the Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s voluntary duty payment before the show-cause notice did not warrant penalty imposition under Section 78. Drawing a distinction from a High Court decision, the Tribunal concluded that the circumstances in the present case did not demonstrate intentional non-payment or evasion of duty, leading to the partial allowance of the appeals regarding penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>