<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 457 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333437</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving the demand of service tax under the commercial and industrial construction service category. The appellant&#039;s liability was assessed for construction services provided in different states, with a dispute over jurisdiction. The Tribunal considered the interpretation of service tax liability pre and post 1.6.2007, the calculation of composite contract value, and the imposition of penalties. Ultimately, the Tribunal directed the appellant to pay a specified amount within 30 days to settle the service tax liability, without imposing a penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2016 15:13:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 457 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333437</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving the demand of service tax under the commercial and industrial construction service category. The appellant&#039;s liability was assessed for construction services provided in different states, with a dispute over jurisdiction. The Tribunal considered the interpretation of service tax liability pre and post 1.6.2007, the calculation of composite contract value, and the imposition of penalties. Ultimately, the Tribunal directed the appellant to pay a specified amount within 30 days to settle the service tax liability, without imposing a penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>