<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 447 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333427</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants were not liable to pay Central Excise Duty on commissioning and installation services as they had already paid Service Tax on the same. The Tribunal emphasized the independence of Central Excise Duty and Service Tax provisions, citing relevant judicial precedents that supported the appellant&#039;s position. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential benefits to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2016 13:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 447 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333427</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants were not liable to pay Central Excise Duty on commissioning and installation services as they had already paid Service Tax on the same. The Tribunal emphasized the independence of Central Excise Duty and Service Tax provisions, citing relevant judicial precedents that supported the appellant&#039;s position. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential benefits to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>