<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 1042 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187198</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that maintenance charges collected by the appellant were not liable to Service Tax under the head &quot;maintenance or repair service&quot; for the period from 09.07.2004 to 31.01.2006. The services were classified as Information Technology Software service, taxable only from 16.05.2008. Consequently, the demand of Service Tax and penalties were set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 09:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 1042 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187198</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that maintenance charges collected by the appellant were not liable to Service Tax under the head &quot;maintenance or repair service&quot; for the period from 09.07.2004 to 31.01.2006. The services were classified as Information Technology Software service, taxable only from 16.05.2008. Consequently, the demand of Service Tax and penalties were set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>