<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 1018 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187196</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai clarified the adjustment of Short Term Capital Loss against Short Term Capital Gain for the assessment year 2008-09. Emphasizing the assessee&#039;s discretion in adjusting losses as per section 70, the Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s claim and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision highlighted the importance of distinguishing between income computation and tax rate application, ruling in favor of the assessee. The judgment, delivered on August 27, 2013, by the Tribunal consisting of Shri I. P. Bansal, JM, and Shri Sanjay Arora, AM, provided a detailed analysis based on legal provisions and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2016 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 1018 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187196</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai clarified the adjustment of Short Term Capital Loss against Short Term Capital Gain for the assessment year 2008-09. Emphasizing the assessee&#039;s discretion in adjusting losses as per section 70, the Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s claim and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision highlighted the importance of distinguishing between income computation and tax rate application, ruling in favor of the assessee. The judgment, delivered on August 27, 2013, by the Tribunal consisting of Shri I. P. Bansal, JM, and Shri Sanjay Arora, AM, provided a detailed analysis based on legal provisions and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>