<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 442 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333422</link>
    <description>Under the ATA Carnet exemption scheme, customs duty was refundable only where imported goods were re-exported within the six-month period permitted by Notification No. 157/1990-Cus., as extended by a further six months. The first consignment, re-exported within one year of import, satisfied the maximum permissible period and refund was admissible. The second consignment, re-exported after one year, fell outside the extended limit and the notification conditions were not met, so refund was not admissible for that item.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 16:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 442 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333422</link>
      <description>Under the ATA Carnet exemption scheme, customs duty was refundable only where imported goods were re-exported within the six-month period permitted by Notification No. 157/1990-Cus., as extended by a further six months. The first consignment, re-exported within one year of import, satisfied the maximum permissible period and refund was admissible. The second consignment, re-exported after one year, fell outside the extended limit and the notification conditions were not met, so refund was not admissible for that item.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>