<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 441 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333421</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand due to the waiver granted for the installation condition breach and the fulfillment of export obligations. The judgment stressed the significance of individual case circumstances in duty demands and compliance with notification conditions under the Foreign Trade Policy scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 10:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 441 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333421</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand due to the waiver granted for the installation condition breach and the fulfillment of export obligations. The judgment stressed the significance of individual case circumstances in duty demands and compliance with notification conditions under the Foreign Trade Policy scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>