<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 435 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333415</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the legality of summoning accused directors in a case involving dishonor of a cheque by a company. The Court emphasized the necessity of specific allegations to establish vicarious liability for directors, requiring them to be in charge of the company&#039;s business at the time of the offense. As the complaint aligned with these principles and showed the accused directors&#039; responsibility for the company&#039;s affairs, the summoning order was upheld, dismissing the petition challenging it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2016 12:17:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 435 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333415</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the legality of summoning accused directors in a case involving dishonor of a cheque by a company. The Court emphasized the necessity of specific allegations to establish vicarious liability for directors, requiring them to be in charge of the company&#039;s business at the time of the offense. As the complaint aligned with these principles and showed the accused directors&#039; responsibility for the company&#039;s affairs, the summoning order was upheld, dismissing the petition challenging it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>