<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (5) TMI 172 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5370</link>
    <description>Income-tax liability is treated as a debt for wealth-tax purposes under section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, but deduction is denied where the liability falls within the statutory exclusions. The text explains that clause (iii)(b) bars deduction if the amount remained outstanding for more than twelve months on the valuation date, and that a later formal order following final adjudication does not restart that period. It also notes that, under clause (iii)(a), the debt remains outside deduction where the amount was outstanding on the valuation date and was disputed in appeal, revision or similar proceedings. The disputed tax liability was therefore not deductible in computing net wealth.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (5) TMI 172 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5370</link>
      <description>Income-tax liability is treated as a debt for wealth-tax purposes under section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, but deduction is denied where the liability falls within the statutory exclusions. The text explains that clause (iii)(b) bars deduction if the amount remained outstanding for more than twelve months on the valuation date, and that a later formal order following final adjudication does not restart that period. It also notes that, under clause (iii)(a), the debt remains outside deduction where the amount was outstanding on the valuation date and was disputed in appeal, revision or similar proceedings. The disputed tax liability was therefore not deductible in computing net wealth.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>