<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 882 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187187</link>
    <description>An order dropping eviction proceedings under Section 4 of the Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955 is appealable under Section 7 because the phrase &quot;every order&quot; covers any determination made by the competent authority, including termination of proceedings. The competent authority is treated as acting in a quasi-judicial capacity, since the statutory scheme requires notice, hearing, consideration of objections, and inquiry powers similar to a civil court. The article notes that the Supreme Court rejected the view that the authority is merely an administrative arm and stated that statutory appeals may be maintained against such dropped proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 882 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187187</link>
      <description>An order dropping eviction proceedings under Section 4 of the Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955 is appealable under Section 7 because the phrase &quot;every order&quot; covers any determination made by the competent authority, including termination of proceedings. The competent authority is treated as acting in a quasi-judicial capacity, since the statutory scheme requires notice, hearing, consideration of objections, and inquiry powers similar to a civil court. The article notes that the Supreme Court rejected the view that the authority is merely an administrative arm and stated that statutory appeals may be maintained against such dropped proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>