<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 882 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187187</link>
    <description>Orders dropping eviction proceedings under Section 4 of the Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955 fall within the appeal provision for &quot;every order&quot; under Section 7. The phrase is not confined to orders directing eviction and includes determinations terminating proceedings after notice and hearing. The competent authority acts quasi-judicially because the statutory process requires notice, hearing, consideration of objections, and confers civil-court-like inquiry powers. Consequently, the State may challenge an order dropping proceedings through a statutory appeal; the contrary High Court view was set aside and the statutory appeals were remitted for decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 882 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187187</link>
      <description>Orders dropping eviction proceedings under Section 4 of the Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955 fall within the appeal provision for &quot;every order&quot; under Section 7. The phrase is not confined to orders directing eviction and includes determinations terminating proceedings after notice and hearing. The competent authority acts quasi-judicially because the statutory process requires notice, hearing, consideration of objections, and confers civil-court-like inquiry powers. Consequently, the State may challenge an order dropping proceedings through a statutory appeal; the contrary High Court view was set aside and the statutory appeals were remitted for decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>