https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187186 The phrase "any person aggrieved" in Section 24 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 must be read in context and does not extend to one Custodian appealing against an order of another Custodian. The statutory scheme separately provided inquiry under Section 7, appeal under Section 24, revision under Section 26, and plenary revision by the Custodian-General under Section 27, showing that a subordinate Custodian was not a party to a lis and had no standing as an aggrieved person. The Assistant Custodian, Headquarters, Patna was therefore not competent to maintain the appeal, and the order passed on that appeal was liable to be quashed. en-us Fri, 10 Mar 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:36:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187186 The phrase "any person aggrieved" in Section 24 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 must be read in context and does not extend to one Custodian appealing against an order of another Custodian. The statutory scheme separately provided inquiry under Section 7, appeal under Section 24, revision under Section 26, and plenary revision by the Custodian-General under Section 27, showing that a subordinate Custodian was not a party to a lis and had no standing as an aggrieved person. The Assistant Custodian, Headquarters, Patna was therefore not competent to maintain the appeal, and the order passed on that appeal was liable to be quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Mar 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187186