<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 649 - CENTRAL SALES TAX APPELLATE AUTHORITY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187185</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, upholding the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision that the transactions involving the supply of zinc to IISCO and TISCO constituted inter-State sales subject to tax. The court directed the transfer of the refundable tax amount from West Bengal and Jharkhand to Andhra Pradesh, where the tax was due for the transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 649 - CENTRAL SALES TAX APPELLATE AUTHORITY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187185</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, upholding the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision that the transactions involving the supply of zinc to IISCO and TISCO constituted inter-State sales subject to tax. The court directed the transfer of the refundable tax amount from West Bengal and Jharkhand to Andhra Pradesh, where the tax was due for the transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>