<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 432 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333412</link>
    <description>Hospital doctors engaged under contracts for services, rather than contracts of service, are independent professionals for tax deduction purposes. The real nature of the engagement governs classification: absence of provident fund, terminal benefits and other master-servant indicators supports professional status. Fixed working hours, discipline requirements and the remuneration structure alone do not establish employment. Payments to such doctors are therefore subject to tax deduction under section 194J rather than salary-based deduction under section 192, and a short-deduction addition based on treating the payments as salary is unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2016 22:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 432 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333412</link>
      <description>Hospital doctors engaged under contracts for services, rather than contracts of service, are independent professionals for tax deduction purposes. The real nature of the engagement governs classification: absence of provident fund, terminal benefits and other master-servant indicators supports professional status. Fixed working hours, discipline requirements and the remuneration structure alone do not establish employment. Payments to such doctors are therefore subject to tax deduction under section 194J rather than salary-based deduction under section 192, and a short-deduction addition based on treating the payments as salary is unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>