https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333405 The Delhi High Court, in a judgment by S. Muralidhar and Vibhu Bakru, JJ., addressed delays of 1494 days in filing the appeal and 1021 days in re-filing it. The Court found the reasons for delay insufficient and dismissed the applications for condonation, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. Emphasizing the importance of timely compliance, the Court highlighted the need for departments to ensure efficient handling of legal matters, especially in adhering to court procedures. en-us Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Oct 2016 09:42:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333405 The Delhi High Court, in a judgment by S. Muralidhar and Vibhu Bakru, JJ., addressed delays of 1494 days in filing the appeal and 1021 days in re-filing it. The Court found the reasons for delay insufficient and dismissed the applications for condonation, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. Emphasizing the importance of timely compliance, the Court highlighted the need for departments to ensure efficient handling of legal matters, especially in adhering to court procedures. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333405