<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 416 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333396</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 invalid due to a defective notice that did not specify the grounds for the penalty. Relying on precedents emphasizing the necessity for clarity in penalty grounds, the Tribunal canceled the penalty of Rs. 7,84,087/- imposed on the assessee for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The appeal was allowed, and the decision was pronounced on 24/08/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2016 09:42:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 416 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333396</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 invalid due to a defective notice that did not specify the grounds for the penalty. Relying on precedents emphasizing the necessity for clarity in penalty grounds, the Tribunal canceled the penalty of Rs. 7,84,087/- imposed on the assessee for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The appeal was allowed, and the decision was pronounced on 24/08/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>