<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 413 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333393</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal challenging various tax issues, including the capitalization of share issue expenses, treatment of consumables expenditure, taxation of advance license receivable, interest on DPEA liability, disallowance of penalty paid to Central Excise Authorities, deduction under section 80M on dividend income, payments to Glaxo Sports Club under Section 40A(9), disallowance for deduction under sections 80I and 80IA, treatment of expenditure under Voluntary Retirement Scheme, and allocation of Head Office Administrative expenses for deduction under Section 80I/80IA. The Court refused to entertain these issues as they were previously settled against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2016 17:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 413 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333393</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal challenging various tax issues, including the capitalization of share issue expenses, treatment of consumables expenditure, taxation of advance license receivable, interest on DPEA liability, disallowance of penalty paid to Central Excise Authorities, deduction under section 80M on dividend income, payments to Glaxo Sports Club under Section 40A(9), disallowance for deduction under sections 80I and 80IA, treatment of expenditure under Voluntary Retirement Scheme, and allocation of Head Office Administrative expenses for deduction under Section 80I/80IA. The Court refused to entertain these issues as they were previously settled against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>