<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 410 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333390</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the seized cash of Rs. 20 lakhs was properly explained by documentary evidence provided by the assessee, showing it belonged to Le Shark Exports Pvt. Ltd. The Tribunal held that the cash should not be treated as unexplained income of the assessee, deleting the addition made by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2016 17:13:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 410 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333390</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the seized cash of Rs. 20 lakhs was properly explained by documentary evidence provided by the assessee, showing it belonged to Le Shark Exports Pvt. Ltd. The Tribunal held that the cash should not be treated as unexplained income of the assessee, deleting the addition made by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>