<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 402 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333382</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, determining that the free distribution of exercise note books constituted advertisement. However, the Court sided with the applicant on the applicability of Section 37(3A), stating that only the net expenditure should be considered for disallowance. The issue of disallowance of deduction under Section 80I on interest income for the Assessment Year 1986-87 was not addressed as the applicant did not pursue it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 402 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333382</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, determining that the free distribution of exercise note books constituted advertisement. However, the Court sided with the applicant on the applicability of Section 37(3A), stating that only the net expenditure should be considered for disallowance. The issue of disallowance of deduction under Section 80I on interest income for the Assessment Year 1986-87 was not addressed as the applicant did not pursue it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>